If you were to ask me what the current state was between
homosexuality and Christianity, I’m not entirely sure how to answer that one. I
would say it is encouraging to see how many churches are becoming openly
affirming and accepting, but there are still far too many yet that are not
anywhere close; and that makes for a very polarized confrontation surrounding
the issue of the level of acceptance.
However, if there is one thing I could say about all of
this—if I were to, say, write a paper on it—my thesis would essentially be
this: Homosexuality is the one issue that—in
order to survive—I feel the church, as the universal body of Christ, will have
to admit defeat and learn from secular culture that homosexuality is not wrong,
but is instead something to be accepted as a natural part of life and (for some
of us) to be embraced.
Alright, alright. I know that is not the most grammatically perfect
thesis in all of published literary works. But, bear with me….
Regardless of whatever you think the biblical passages say
and mean, I think there is a fundamental problem with the way Christianity
treats LGBTQ individuals—a problem that existed for me way back before I
accepted myself as a gay man, back when I would have been considered a
"fundamentalist Christian."
For me, I always felt my hands were tied by my faith. I
wanted to be affirming of gay people, but the way I understood scripture implied
it was wrong. And so, I bit my tongue and went along with it.
But in the back of my mind, I did not think that was right.
I just could not understand how something like being gay was so detestable before
God. I mean, for the few gay people I knew before I came out, there were very
few whose lifestyles I would have thought God had a problem with.
And it is that doubt that made me understand something. Why
do we hold on so dearly to something that in essence we do not really agree
with?
Now, I want you to sincerely consider this for yourselves:
let us hypothetically say that our religion is not an issue.... Do any of us
actually think that homosexuality in essence is really all that serious of an
issue? If you do, are you sure that it is not just your personal bias or
prejudice clouding your judgment?
For me, no matter what I read the Bible to be saying, I have
never really deep-down believed that it is truly right to condemn homosexuality.
I always felt something deeply unsettling about it in my gut, just like my
conscience was trying to tell me not to follow along with it—in the same way
that your conscience tells you it is wrong to break the law or hurt another
person.
It is just one of those deep-level moral convictions that
you cannot really explain very well in words. And so, I ask again: Why do we
hold on so dearly to something that in essence we do not really agree with? Is
it just for the principle of the thing?
I wrestled with this for a long time—in fact well into my college
career. And during this time, the professions of science and medicine were
releasing statements that homosexuality is not wrong, is a natural part of
life, etc.
And after awhile, I simply realized how insignificant that
principle really was, and so I asked myself what would happen if I did let go
of it. What would happen to my faith and everything I believed in if I stopped
agreeing with what I thought the Bible said about homosexuality? The answer:
very little.
I mean, I still read the Bible with the primary focus of
Jesus in mind. I still place Jesus’ ministry as the model upon which I base my
own ministry. What has changed is not something that really registers very high
on my theology scale.
Invariably, this led me to my official, public coming out in December of 2010. And I make this clear: I did not come out and then resign to this conclusion; I came to this conclusion regardless of my sexual orientation, and then decided it was time for me to come out.
And that is how I chose my current position between
Christianity and…um…“secular culture” (really, call it whatever you
like…science, medicine, democracy, etc.). I decided Christianity was wrong and
that “secular culture” actually had some very solid evidence for why homosexuality
was not.
For me, modern science and medicine actually made more sense
and resonated more with me on the issue of homosexuality than my own inherited religious tradition.
Now, before you go working yourself all into a fuss,
understand one VERY important thing. This would not be the first time that
Christianity has evolved based on the culture it encountered. In fact…that is
arguably the very reason Christianity
has survived this long to be the largest religion in the world by number of
adherents—roughly 500 million ahead of its next competitor: Islam.
I mean, no one can argue against modern Christianity being
foundationally built on the philosophies of Plato (which it has been since St.
Augustine integrated them together in the 4th and 5th centuries CE—or even the
Gospel of John, which has very strong evidence of Greek philosophy being
incorporated into its style of writing).
I believe we are currently seeing another such cultural
shift with the issue of homosexuality in the church, like the one we saw with
the African-American civil rights movement of the 1960s. I think we, as a body
of Christ, need to honorably accept our defeat, heal, and move on in the same
way we have time and time again throughout history.
I simply ask that you look deeply into your own hearts and
ask these two things: (1) Do you really think that homosexuality is inherently that
big of an issue, and (2) what would your faith and beliefs look like if you did
actually become accepting and affirming?
How can we as Christians, believers of God and supposedly have faith in God say Christianity is wrong and base a decision on human science and secular culture? Isn't being a Christian and following Jesus pretty much going in the opposite direction of secular culture? Is our faith weak if we have to use science and secular culture to come to a conclusion about a religious or faith issue?
ReplyDeleteI do not think the definition of being Christian is opposite of "secular culture". Granted, my use of the word "secular culture" here and in this post does not equate Atheism. It simply implies any mechanism of gaining understanding outside of a specific faith tradition. For me, this is science.
DeleteAlso, is is not possible for secular culture to become more in-line or in-tune with Christian ideals without claiming the Christian faith? If we always just go against secular culture there is a strong likelihood that we will eventually go against ideals that are essentially Christian--which is counter-productive.
You should also be aware that I think faith is impossible without an element of doubt or uncertainty. Science essentially seeks answers to our uncertainties from an unbiased standpoint. So when something comes along that science can make more clear, why is it wrong to try and understand our faith with it being incorporated? Is it just because it wasn't written down in a book 2000 years ago?
I wouldn't say my application of faith is being weak, I would say that it is being relevantly in-tune with the culture around us.
We should not go against secular culture just because we are christians and think we need to be different. I think if we are following Jesus, secular culture does not match up with his teachings. I agree to have faith you will doubt at some point in your journey probably many times. To have true faith should you not be able to overcome your doubt?
DeleteIf I just can not wrap my mind around the creation story, should I look to science for answers. The science of evolution is very depressing to me. If we are so precious to God and are the care takers of the earth, what worth am I if I came from a fish or a monkey? Science can be manipulated God can't.
I would not say the definition of a christian is to go against secular culture, but Romans 12:2 clearly states that we are not to conform to the patterns of this world, which I would say includes homosexuality.
DeleteI think we have different understandings of the terms used here, and it is creating a misunderstanding. When you say "secular culture" and "faith" and "science," what things are you implying by them?
DeleteIn terms of "faith" I think we have very very similar ideas, but something does not line up right; I agree with what you are saying there, but I do not see how in contradicts what I have said.
And I would say the scientific theory of evolution has very little to do with this discussion. However I think the observable sciences like Anatomy and Physiology, and the observable social sciences of Sociology, Psychology, and Anthropology all DO relate to what we are talking about. And I think Christianity already does occasionally apply those to our faith and faith community.
So what about when those fields ALSO say there is nothing essentially wrong or unhealthy about homosexuality? It is hypocritical to accept some parts and then deny others on a whim. And I think that is the same problem with all of science. We cannot just capriciously say some is good and some is bad.